Australian Men National Team 2017

U22U20/21U18/19U16/17
Check also Women National Team
Roster for FIBA Asia Cup

Starting five
Cameron Gliddon
Gliddon
Jason Cadee
Cadee
Mitch Creek
Creek
Daniel Kickert
Kickert
Matt Hodgson
Hodgson
4 Cameron Gliddon 196-G/F-89 Avtodor Russia
5 Jason Cadee 186-G-91 Kymis Greece
6 Mitch Norton 184-G-93 Southland S. New Zealand
7 Mitch Creek 195-F/G-92 36ers Australia
8 Brad Newley 199-F/G-85 AEK Athens Greece
9 Mitchell McCarron 191-G-92 SC Rangers New Zealand
10 Todd Blanchfield 200-F/G-91 Townsville H. Australia
11 Nick Kay 206-C/F-92 Southland S. New Zealand
12 Daniel Kickert 208-C/F-83 SW Metro P. Australia
13 David Andersen 213-C-80 ASVEL France
14 Angus Brandt 208-C-89 Wildcats Australia
15 Matt Hodgson 211-C-91 Knox R. Australia

Andrej Lemanis Head Coach Bullets Australia
Adam Caporn Assistant
Luc Longley Assistant

Roster for FIBA WC 2019 Qualifications

Starting five
Cameron Gliddon
Gliddon
Jason Cadee
Cadee
Matt Hodgson
Hodgson
Daniel Kickert
Kickert
Mitch Creek
Creek
2 Nathan Sobey 190-G-90 36ers Australia
3 Cameron Gliddon 197-G/F-89 Taipans Australia
4 Chris Goulding 192-G-88 United Australia
5 Jason Cadee 186-G-91 Kings Australia
7 Nick Kay 206-C/F-92 Hawks Australia
8 Brad Newley 199-F/G-85 Kings Australia
9 Mitchell McCarron 191-G-92 Taipans Australia
10 Matt Hodgson 211-C-91 36ers Australia
12 Daniel Kickert 208-C/F-83 Bullets Australia
14 Angus Brandt 208-C-89 Wildcats Australia
15 Damian Martin 186-C-84 Wildcats Australia
55 Mitch Creek 195-F/G-92 36ers Australia

Andrej Lemanis Head Coach Bullets Australia
Adam Caporn Assistant
Luc Longley Assistant




*FIBA Asia Cup (2017)
  Field Goals Rebounds  
# Name G min fgm-a   3pm-a  % ftm-a   off def tot ast pf st bs to pts
7 Creek, Mitch 6 23 70.0% 50.0% 66.7% 1.8 3.3 5.2 2.3 1.3 1.8 0.3 1.2 14.7
7 Creek, Mitch 6 23 70.0% 50.0% 66.7% 1.8 3.3 5.2 2.3 1.3 1.8 0.3 1.2 14.7
7 Creek, Mitch 6 23 70.0% 50.0% 66.7% 1.8 3.3 5.2 2.3 1.3 1.8 0.3 1.2 14.7
7 Creek, Mitch 6 23 70.0% 50.0% 66.7% 1.8 3.3 5.2 2.3 1.3 1.8 0.3 1.2 14.7
7 Creek, Mitch 6 23 70.0% 50.0% 66.7% 1.8 3.3 5.2 2.3 1.3 1.8 0.3 1.2 14.7
7 Creek, Mitch 6 23 70.0% 50.0% 66.7% 1.8 3.3 5.2 2.3 1.3 1.8 0.3 1.2 14.7
7 Creek, Mitch 6 23 70.0% 50.0% 66.7% 1.8 3.3 5.2 2.3 1.3 1.8 0.3 1.2 14.7
7 Creek, Mitch 6 23 70.0% 50.0% 66.7% 1.8 3.3 5.2 2.3 1.3 1.8 0.3 1.2 14.7
5 Cadee, Jason 6 23 50.0% 32.4% 71.4% 0.5 2.0 2.5 4.7 2.0 0.7 0.0 1.8 10.0
5 Cadee, Jason 6 23 50.0% 32.4% 71.4% 0.5 2.0 2.5 4.7 2.0 0.7 0.0 1.8 10.0
5 Cadee, Jason 6 23 50.0% 32.4% 71.4% 0.5 2.0 2.5 4.7 2.0 0.7 0.0 1.8 10.0
5 Cadee, Jason 6 23 50.0% 32.4% 71.4% 0.5 2.0 2.5 4.7 2.0 0.7 0.0 1.8 10.0
5 Cadee, Jason 6 23 50.0% 32.4% 71.4% 0.5 2.0 2.5 4.7 2.0 0.7 0.0 1.8 10.0
5 Cadee, Jason 6 23 50.0% 32.4% 71.4% 0.5 2.0 2.5 4.7 2.0 0.7 0.0 1.8 10.0
5 Cadee, Jason 6 23 50.0% 32.4% 71.4% 0.5 2.0 2.5 4.7 2.0 0.7 0.0 1.8 10.0
5 Cadee, Jason 6 23 50.0% 32.4% 71.4% 0.5 2.0 2.5 4.7 2.0 0.7 0.0 1.8 10.0
12 Kickert, Daniel 6 22 47.1% 40.0% 92.3% 0.8 3.8 4.7 3.2 1.3 0.7 0.3 1.7 12.3
12 Kickert, Daniel 6 22 47.1% 40.0% 92.3% 0.8 3.8 4.7 3.2 1.3 0.7 0.3 1.7 12.3
12 Kickert, Daniel 6 22 47.1% 40.0% 92.3% 0.8 3.8 4.7 3.2 1.3 0.7 0.3 1.7 12.3
12 Kickert, Daniel 6 22 47.1% 40.0% 92.3% 0.8 3.8 4.7 3.2 1.3 0.7 0.3 1.7 12.3
12 Kickert, Daniel 6 22 47.1% 40.0% 92.3% 0.8 3.8 4.7 3.2 1.3 0.7 0.3 1.7 12.3
12 Kickert, Daniel 6 22 47.1% 40.0% 92.3% 0.8 3.8 4.7 3.2 1.3 0.7 0.3 1.7 12.3
12 Kickert, Daniel 6 22 47.1% 40.0% 92.3% 0.8 3.8 4.7 3.2 1.3 0.7 0.3 1.7 12.3
12 Kickert, Daniel 6 22 47.1% 40.0% 92.3% 0.8 3.8 4.7 3.2 1.3 0.7 0.3 1.7 12.3
9 McCarron, Mitchell 6 19 64.0% 58.3% 85.7% 1.8 2.5 4.3 1.3 1.5 1.0 0.2 1.0 9.8
9 McCarron, Mitchell 6 19 64.0% 58.3% 85.7% 1.8 2.5 4.3 1.3 1.5 1.0 0.2 1.0 9.8
9 McCarron, Mitchell 6 19 64.0% 58.3% 85.7% 1.8 2.5 4.3 1.3 1.5 1.0 0.2 1.0 9.8
9 McCarron, Mitchell 6 19 64.0% 58.3% 85.7% 1.8 2.5 4.3 1.3 1.5 1.0 0.2 1.0 9.8
9 McCarron, Mitchell 6 19 64.0% 58.3% 85.7% 1.8 2.5 4.3 1.3 1.5 1.0 0.2 1.0 9.8
9 McCarron, Mitchell 6 19 64.0% 58.3% 85.7% 1.8 2.5 4.3 1.3 1.5 1.0 0.2 1.0 9.8
9 McCarron, Mitchell 6 19 64.0% 58.3% 85.7% 1.8 2.5 4.3 1.3 1.5 1.0 0.2 1.0 9.8
9 McCarron, Mitchell 6 19 64.0% 58.3% 85.7% 1.8 2.5 4.3 1.3 1.5 1.0 0.2 1.0 9.8
14 Brandt, Angus 6 18 57.9% 0.0% 62.5% 1.3 4.2 5.5 1.8 2.3 0.5 0.0 1.8 8.2
14 Brandt, Angus 6 18 57.9% 0.0% 62.5% 1.3 4.2 5.5 1.8 2.3 0.5 0.0 1.8 8.2
14 Brandt, Angus 6 18 57.9% 0.0% 62.5% 1.3 4.2 5.5 1.8 2.3 0.5 0.0 1.8 8.2
14 Brandt, Angus 6 18 57.9% 0.0% 62.5% 1.3 4.2 5.5 1.8 2.3 0.5 0.0 1.8 8.2
14 Brandt, Angus 6 18 57.9% 0.0% 62.5% 1.3 4.2 5.5 1.8 2.3 0.5 0.0 1.8 8.2
14 Brandt, Angus 6 18 57.9% 0.0% 62.5% 1.3 4.2 5.5 1.8 2.3 0.5 0.0 1.8 8.2
14 Brandt, Angus 6 18 57.9% 0.0% 62.5% 1.3 4.2 5.5 1.8 2.3 0.5 0.0 1.8 8.2
14 Brandt, Angus 6 18 57.9% 0.0% 62.5% 1.3 4.2 5.5 1.8 2.3 0.5 0.0 1.8 8.2
11 Kay, Nick 6 18 54.5% 40.0% 92.9% 1.5 2.3 3.8 2.2 1.7 0.8 0.0 0.8 7.2
11 Kay, Nick 6 18 54.5% 40.0% 92.9% 1.5 2.3 3.8 2.2 1.7 0.8 0.0 0.8 7.2
11 Kay, Nick 6 18 54.5% 40.0% 92.9% 1.5 2.3 3.8 2.2 1.7 0.8 0.0 0.8 7.2
11 Kay, Nick 6 18 54.5% 40.0% 92.9% 1.5 2.3 3.8 2.2 1.7 0.8 0.0 0.8 7.2
11 Kay, Nick 6 18 54.5% 40.0% 92.9% 1.5 2.3 3.8 2.2 1.7 0.8 0.0 0.8 7.2
11 Kay, Nick 6 18 54.5% 40.0% 92.9% 1.5 2.3 3.8 2.2 1.7 0.8 0.0 0.8 7.2
11 Kay, Nick 6 18 54.5% 40.0% 92.9% 1.5 2.3 3.8 2.2 1.7 0.8 0.0 0.8 7.2
11 Kay, Nick 6 18 54.5% 40.0% 92.9% 1.5 2.3 3.8 2.2 1.7 0.8 0.0 0.8 7.2
6 Norton, Mitch 6 15 56.3% 14.3% 86.7% 0.5 0.3 0.8 2.0 1.2 1.2 0.0 1.0 5.7
6 Norton, Mitch 6 15 56.3% 14.3% 86.7% 0.5 0.3 0.8 2.0 1.2 1.2 0.0 1.0 5.7
6 Norton, Mitch 6 15 56.3% 14.3% 86.7% 0.5 0.3 0.8 2.0 1.2 1.2 0.0 1.0 5.7
6 Norton, Mitch 6 15 56.3% 14.3% 86.7% 0.5 0.3 0.8 2.0 1.2 1.2 0.0 1.0 5.7
6 Norton, Mitch 6 15 56.3% 14.3% 86.7% 0.5 0.3 0.8 2.0 1.2 1.2 0.0 1.0 5.7
6 Norton, Mitch 6 15 56.3% 14.3% 86.7% 0.5 0.3 0.8 2.0 1.2 1.2 0.0 1.0 5.7
6 Norton, Mitch 6 15 56.3% 14.3% 86.7% 0.5 0.3 0.8 2.0 1.2 1.2 0.0 1.0 5.7
6 Norton, Mitch 6 15 56.3% 14.3% 86.7% 0.5 0.3 0.8 2.0 1.2 1.2 0.0 1.0 5.7
10 Blanchfield, Todd 6 12 87.5% 30.0% 66.7% 0.2 1.8 2.0 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.5 5.7
10 Blanchfield, Todd 6 12 87.5% 30.0% 66.7% 0.2 1.8 2.0 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.5 5.7
10 Blanchfield, Todd 6 12 87.5% 30.0% 66.7% 0.2 1.8 2.0 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.5 5.7
10 Blanchfield, Todd 6 12 87.5% 30.0% 66.7% 0.2 1.8 2.0 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.5 5.7
10 Blanchfield, Todd 6 12 87.5% 30.0% 66.7% 0.2 1.8 2.0 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.5 5.7
10 Blanchfield, Todd 6 12 87.5% 30.0% 66.7% 0.2 1.8 2.0 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.5 5.7
10 Blanchfield, Todd 6 12 87.5% 30.0% 66.7% 0.2 1.8 2.0 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.5 5.7
10 Blanchfield, Todd 6 12 87.5% 30.0% 66.7% 0.2 1.8 2.0 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.5 5.7
8 Newley, Brad 5 20 54.2% 21.4% 100.0% 0.4 2.0 2.4 4.0 2.2 1.2 0.0 1.4 7.8
8 Newley, Brad 5 20 54.2% 21.4% 100.0% 0.4 2.0 2.4 4.0 2.2 1.2 0.0 1.4 7.8
8 Newley, Brad 5 20 54.2% 21.4% 100.0% 0.4 2.0 2.4 4.0 2.2 1.2 0.0 1.4 7.8
8 Newley, Brad 5 20 54.2% 21.4% 100.0% 0.4 2.0 2.4 4.0 2.2 1.2 0.0 1.4 7.8
8 Newley, Brad 5 20 54.2% 21.4% 100.0% 0.4 2.0 2.4 4.0 2.2 1.2 0.0 1.4 7.8
8 Newley, Brad 5 20 54.2% 21.4% 100.0% 0.4 2.0 2.4 4.0 2.2 1.2 0.0 1.4 7.8
8 Newley, Brad 5 20 54.2% 21.4% 100.0% 0.4 2.0 2.4 4.0 2.2 1.2 0.0 1.4 7.8
8 Newley, Brad 5 20 54.2% 21.4% 100.0% 0.4 2.0 2.4 4.0 2.2 1.2 0.0 1.4 7.8
15 Hodgson, Matt 5 19 65.5% 0.0% 30.0% 4.2 2.4 6.6 1.2 2.8 0.4 1.0 1.8 8.8
15 Hodgson, Matt 5 19 65.5% 0.0% 30.0% 4.2 2.4 6.6 1.2 2.8 0.4 1.0 1.8 8.8
15 Hodgson, Matt 5 19 65.5% 0.0% 30.0% 4.2 2.4 6.6 1.2 2.8 0.4 1.0 1.8 8.8
15 Hodgson, Matt 5 19 65.5% 0.0% 30.0% 4.2 2.4 6.6 1.2 2.8 0.4 1.0 1.8 8.8
15 Hodgson, Matt 5 19 65.5% 0.0% 30.0% 4.2 2.4 6.6 1.2 2.8 0.4 1.0 1.8 8.8
15 Hodgson, Matt 5 19 65.5% 0.0% 30.0% 4.2 2.4 6.6 1.2 2.8 0.4 1.0 1.8 8.8
15 Hodgson, Matt 5 19 65.5% 0.0% 30.0% 4.2 2.4 6.6 1.2 2.8 0.4 1.0 1.8 8.8
15 Hodgson, Matt 5 19 65.5% 0.0% 30.0% 4.2 2.4 6.6 1.2 2.8 0.4 1.0 1.8 8.8
4 Gliddon, Cameron 5 16 75.0% 38.9% 100.0% 0.6 2.6 3.2 1.4 0.8 0.6 0.0 1.2 6.2
4 Gliddon, Cameron 5 16 75.0% 38.9% 100.0% 0.6 2.6 3.2 1.4 0.8 0.6 0.0 1.2 6.2
4 Gliddon, Cameron 5 16 75.0% 38.9% 100.0% 0.6 2.6 3.2 1.4 0.8 0.6 0.0 1.2 6.2
4 Gliddon, Cameron 5 16 75.0% 38.9% 100.0% 0.6 2.6 3.2 1.4 0.8 0.6 0.0 1.2 6.2
4 Gliddon, Cameron 5 16 75.0% 38.9% 100.0% 0.6 2.6 3.2 1.4 0.8 0.6 0.0 1.2 6.2
4 Gliddon, Cameron 5 16 75.0% 38.9% 100.0% 0.6 2.6 3.2 1.4 0.8 0.6 0.0 1.2 6.2
4 Gliddon, Cameron 5 16 75.0% 38.9% 100.0% 0.6 2.6 3.2 1.4 0.8 0.6 0.0 1.2 6.2
4 Gliddon, Cameron 5 16 75.0% 38.9% 100.0% 0.6 2.6 3.2 1.4 0.8 0.6 0.0 1.2 6.2